Karl Jaspers and Seung Sahn Essay -- Compare Contrast Philosophy Essay

Karl Jaspers and Seung Sahn In this paper I will make a correlation between the considerations of Karl Jaspers and Korean Zen ace Seung Sahn on the idea of cognizance and amazing quality. The articles being referred to by Jaspers are his expositions â€Å"On the Origin of My Philosophy,† written in 1941, and his talks on the centrality of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche and â€Å"the Encompassing,† given in 1935 (p. 158). The other content being examined is The Compass of Zen, a gathering of Seung Sahn’s addresses on the three fundamental parts of Buddhism. The Compass of Zen was started during the 1960s as a fundamental book to clarify the â€Å"bone,† or basic quintessence, of Buddhism to Sahn’s Zen understudies. The 1960s got a sharp ascent on intrigue Buddhism among Americans, and The Compass of Zen is frequently utilized as a groundwork to assist Westerners with understanding its lessons. In this manner, Sahn has joined lessons from all over Asia (the three primary parts of Hin ayana, Mahayana, and Zen Buddhism) into one content. Jasper’s reasoning is comparatively founded on the craving for a â€Å"universal chronicled view.† He thought about the three primary wellsprings of philosophical idea to be India, the Orient, and the Western convention starting with the Greeks. He composes that it is imperative to comprehend a wide range of sorts of ways of thinking since they all spring from the essential human want for comprehension. As he writes in Kaufmann’s collection, â€Å"there is more than one generally accepted fact in man.† Both Jaspers and Sahn are attempting to make an all around material way of thinking of internal reflection (contemplation) to pick up amazing quality (edification, nirvana, moshka, satori); in down to earth terms, inward harmony. Jaspers’ reasoning is situated in the possibility that way of thinking is destroyed by endeavors to place it into ... ... referenced in Jaspers, it is unmistakable in the considering both Bergman and Camus.) As should be obvious, the methods of reasoning of Jaspers and Seung Sahn concur on a considerable lot of a similar basic focuses, especially on the structure and beginning of awareness. Where the two contrast is in inquiries of system. Jaspers needs to extend the constraints of thought to discover amazing quality, while Buddhism (especially Zen) attempts to go to a spot past idea, before thought, and believes it best to do this by not thinking. Works Cited Jaspers, Karl. â€Å"On the Origin of My Philosophy,† â€Å"Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, â€Å"The Encompassing.† Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre. Ed. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Plume, 2004. p.158-232. Sahn, Zen Master Seung. The Compass of Zen. Boston: Shambhala, 1997. Tzu, Lao. Tao Te Ching. Trans. David Hinton. Washington, DC: Counterpoint, 2002.